Miniike wrote:So a pretentious arthouse experimental film?
Sounds awesome, I'm all there. I'll watch it sometime.
it's not really pretentious
its kinda like a reality tv show where nobody is in on the joke
Ohokaipapaya wrote:it's not really pretentious
its kinda like a reality tv show where nobody is in on the joke
Doesn't make it any good though.Miniike wrote:wasn't it intentionally bad tho?
Entertaining isn't good? Or did you not find it entertaining?SirWrek wrote:Doesn't make it any good though.
I don't know... I guess some elements about the absurdity were entertaining enough, but I still wasn't particularly fond of the whole endeavor.Miniike wrote:Entertaining isn't good? Or did you not find it entertaining?
ohhhhhhSirWrek wrote:I don't know... I guess some elements about the absurdity were entertaining enough, but I still wasn't particularly fond of the whole endeavor.
You appear to mix up "random" and "unbelievably imaginative".Entity wrote:Spirited Away was just kinda... random. It felt like a lot of loose ends went untied.
I have heard quite a bit about Her, but never seen it. Sounds interesting though.Phantomboy wrote:I recently got around to seeing the film "Her" have anyone else here seen it?
It is set in a near-future world, about love and relations between an artificial intelligence and a human. It certainly caught my attention and was fairly interesting and refreshing, I do have some issues saying it is entirely original but it was quire interesting.
so if your goal is to not be successful you will either be successful (by not being successful) or you will not be successful (by being successful)papaya wrote:failed at achieving your original goal
if your original goal is to have your film be successful, and it makes money, then you are successful in being successful
context