The forum has been archived
While the forum may not be active, the community still lives on Discord! Click here to join us.

Onemoreblock Rules Update - Feedback And Input

A place to talk about our community
User avatar
Phantomboy
Moderator
Posts: 5417
Joined: October 9th, 2012, 11:04 am

Post by Phantomboy »

I never said that I would, my point was rather that we will need to look at each case independently. Referring to the rules where applicable. It is impossible to chart every insult, from every joke and have a reasonable, cohesive rule set between them. I was saying that a positive attitude is just a good habit in most cases.

I think, while for someone like me would could easily get pedantic and start charting every occurrence with a mode of action, for any normal person it is better to evaluate each instance and choose a logical solution. So, you are right - siding with those who are upset is not the fix all answer, because a fix all answer doesn't exist :P
Image
freekboy31
Member
Posts: 839
Joined: October 9th, 2012, 8:08 am

Post by freekboy31 »

If the user #1 says he hates user #2 and user #2 can't get over it, he'll do something that leads to another case. Those things should not be taken seriously. Plus, it's up to the user how he/she acts when someone did say that.
:crate: :atmobot: coming soon..... :sentrybot:
:brickblock: :brickblock: :brickblock: :monkeyblock: :brickblock: :brickblock:
:brickblock: :brickblock: :brickblock: :brickblock: :brickblock: :brickblock:

Image
User avatar
Entity
Editorial Staff
Posts: 3097
Joined: November 29th, 2012, 9:41 pm
Design Competitions Voted: 1

Post by Entity »

Then again, maybe User #1 should be more careful about what he says?

Here's an idea, maybe there's only one rule: "You'll have to answer to the mods for your actions." And then a separate list of general guidelines for the mods (e.g. users should be polite, no porn etc... basically the rules we have now). Like people were saying, this isn't a huge forum, and the mods are reasonable people. I think this would give people much less reason to argue with the specific wording of the rules, and keep the spirit of the rules as simply "keeping the order."
:crate: :crate: :crate: :crate: :crate: :crate:
User avatar
Phantomboy
Moderator
Posts: 5417
Joined: October 9th, 2012, 11:04 am

Post by Phantomboy »

I am not sure what you mean by "answer to the mods" exactly. In general, if any thing happens, a post gets deleted, a thread gets locked, ect.. You don't need to change the topic of the thread or create an entirely new thread, just send me a conversation saying, "So and so happened, what's up, why did you do that?" and I will be pretty quick to get back to you. Given adequate reasoning, I am always willing to make changes. So, while in extreme cases, users will likely be cited the specific rules, I don't really it is as necessary for common little things.

So, as the rules state at the end "Users are expected to follow the spirit, not the letter, of these rules." which I think is a pretty good summery of my feelings on this :P (Even if I wasn't the one to write that bit, oh hehehe)
Image
Post Reply